John Boehner Fends Off Yet Another Quixotic Tea Party Challenge

In the end, the Tea Party challenge to John Boehner was a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

boehner_gavel

As expected, the challenge to John Boehner’s election as Speaker fell well short of anything approaching success notwithstanding much breathless anticipation from the political media and Tea Party groups:

Republicans took full control of Congress Tuesday for the first time in eight years, and John A. Boehner was reelected as House speaker, after a group of hard-right conservatives tried and failed to deny him another term.

Boehner’s election provided the only drama on a day of ceremony and swearings-in on Capitol Hill. But, in the end, even that drama didn’t last very long. His adversaries need to turn 30-plus other Republicans against Boehner to prevent him from winning a majority on the first vote.

They got 25 — 24 no votes and and one simply voting present. As a clerk called 408 members one by one, those rebellious Republicans shouted out a variety of names: GOP House members, even two sitting senators. But the other Republicans all called out Boehner’s name, and that was enough.

(…)

In the House, the group that had plotted a coup against Boehner had little hope of electing another Republican in the first round of voting. But they still hoped to humiliate him by splintering the votes so that no one won.

That would have sent the speaker’s election to a second round of voting, for the first time since the 1920s. It would also have sent the House into recess, so Republicans could retreat into their basement meeting room for an epic airing of grievances. Then — maybe — the plotters hoped that Boehner would take himself out of the running, in favor of a new GOP candidate.

“This is the result of a couple weeks of hard work,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the plotters, said in an interview. He said that Boehner’s team was “whipping,” or cajoling uncertain allies, to defeat the coup attempt. Boehner defeated a similar effort in 2013. “The leadership is nervous, they’re whipping, and they know if they don’t, they’ll lose.”

In the end, their effort seemed to show how splintered the anti-Boehner forces were, instead. Some of their group voted for Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Fla.), others for Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), and others for Rep. Daniel Webster (R-Fla.). One cast a vote for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and an Alabama congressman voted for his home-state senator, Jeff Sessions (R).

In the end, the threshold that the insurgents needed to defeat Boehner ended up being larger because there were about a dozen Members of Congress who were not present for this afternoon’s vote. In at least one case, that was because Congressman Trey Gowdy’s flight got canceled due to today’s inclement weather in the District of Columbia. The majority of the missing members were members of the New York delegation and other top ranking Democrats who decided to forego today’s largely ceremonial vote to attend the funeral for former New York Governor Mario Cuomo in New York City. Additionally, prior to the vote, Congressman Michael Grimm, who had been convicted on tax evasion charges prior to Christmas, made his resignation official. As a result, the membership eligible to vote today was only 408, which basically meant that Boehner only needed to get 204 votes to be elected. No doubt, this cushion allowed some members to vote against him without having to worry about being the decisive vote that would send the Speakership vote to a second ballot for the first time since 1923. The number of people voting for someone other than Boehner was larger than it was two years ago, but the impact was largely the same, namely no impact at all.

Some observers will note, of course, that this is likely a sign that the Tea Party Caucus is likely to continue to be a thorn in the side of leadership over the next two years just as it has been over the past four years. Most immediately, it is likely to be a strong voice in favor of taking some kind of punitive step in response to the President’s executive action on immigration. However, as this vote demonstrates the additional votes that Speaker Boehner has been granted thanks to GOP victories last November and the possibility that he has much more maneuvering room than he did after the 2010 and 2012 elections. What impact that has on the agenda going forward, of course, remains to be seen. For the most part, though, it appears that the Tea Party rebellion against Boehner was much ado about nothing.

FILED UNDER: Congress, US Politics,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. CSK says:

    This was all about grandstanding. Gohmert and Yoho knew full well they had zero chance of dumping Boehner. But I think they did see a chance to pull off a Ted Cruz-like stunt and huff, puff, bloviate, and blather to garner a lot of publicity and, presumably, donations.

    The Tea Party is, of course, practically suicidal over this. They really do live in an alternate reality.

  2. JWH says:

    If they really wanted to mess with Boehner, they should have cast their votes for Nancy Pelosi.

  3. CSK says:

    @JWH: Particularly since the Tea Party appears to believe that there’s no difference betwixt the two.

  4. HarvardLaw92 says:

    On an unrelated (sort of) note, Bob McDonnell just got sentenced to 2 years in federal prison, which frankly was a gift.

  5. anjin-san says:

    Now on to the important business of attacking Social Security.

    New GOP Congress Fires Shot At Social Security On Day One

    With a little-noticed proposal, Republicans took aim at Social Security on the very first day of the 114th Congress.

    The incoming GOP majority approved late Tuesday a new rule that experts say could provoke an unprecedented crisis that conservatives could use as leverage in upcoming debates over entitlement reform.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/social-security-di-house-rules-change

  6. James Pearce says:

    Saw Boehner on CNN earlier. No tears.

    this vote demonstrates the additional votes that Speaker Boehner has been granted thanks to GOP victories last November

    This is a good point. Maybe some of those guys will be semi-moderate? One can hope.

  7. Liberal Capitalist says:

    Quixotic

    no… no… no.

    You’re mixing metaphors.

    He’s an Orange Oompa-loompa, so you have to stick to Wonka based literary allusions… Or Shakespearean Tragedy.

    In any case: The suspense is terrible. I hope it’ll last.

  8. C. Clavin says:

    The Republicans first act was to direct the CBO to start using Dynamic Scoring…in other words to ignore math and facts in favor of magic and fiction.
    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/01/congresss-first-act-was-to-declare-war-on-math.html
    Their second act was to attack Social Security.
    http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-on-day-onel-new-congress-launches-attack-on-social-security-20150106-column.html
    The Republican war on the middle class continues apace.

  9. Barry says:

    Doug, I love the subtitle.

  10. grumpy realist says:

    Totally OT, but did anyone see the whole Kirby Delauter flame-out?

    Wow, we’re not talking a high level of braincells here, are we….

  11. Mikey says:

    @grumpy realist: The dumbass didn’t even lock his own name on Twitter, so we have all kinds of wonderfully inane Tweets from “@KirbyDelauter.” Like this one: https://twitter.com/KirbyDelauter/status/552886521746169859 “OFFICIAL PERMISSION FORM. Use it or else.” LOL