Mitt Romney May Have Less Time Than He Thinks
John Ellis argues that Rick Perry may be on the verge of making it next to impossible for Mitt Romney, or anyone else, to stop him from winning the Republican nomination:
Once Labor Day has passed, there will be five debates, in quick succession, on the GOP presidential candidates’ calendars. These will be important tests for Perry. If at the end of two or three, it’s clear that he’s every bit the equal of Mitt Romney on matters of policy and politics, then the Perry juggernaut becomes all but unstoppable. Romney’s “I’m the only electable one” argument will vanish and the party’s base will nominate one of their own. If Perry stumbles badly in the debates, Romney’s campaign gets a second wind.
Knowing that the only things standing between Perry and the GOP nomination are a couple of “good enough” debate performances, the GOP “establishment” faces a choice: they can cross their fingers and hope for the best or mount a sustained negative campaign to destroy Perry with the party’s base. It is likely that, after Labor Day, a sustained negative campaign against Perry will be launched.In the meantime, Perry has the luxury of thinking nationally. As President Obama’s political standing continues to erode, the “electability” hurdle gets lower. The base is beginning to think that anyone can beat Obama. And there is already talk that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie are Perry’s top two choices for vice president. This has GOP activists nearly giddy with glee. A Perry-Christie ticket would be more than electable; it would be formidable. It would also bring the GOP “establishment” back inside his tent, which is where Perry wants them and needs them to be.
The real test, then, will be the five upcoming debates. If Perry does well enough in those to convince the base that he can command the national stage, then the caucus and primary season won’t be long. It’ll be over before you know it.
Sounds like Team Bush trying to raise expectations. They think Perry will not be shown to be every bit the equal of Romney and then it will be time for everyone to get in line for a coronation.
I’ve heard the Perry-Christie angle thrown around quite a bit. Why would Christie go for such a thing? He’s not interested in the Presidency (even though he would be just a strong of a campaigner as Romney or Perry), yet would be ok with the do-nothing job of a VP? It’s surely not for his political future. He’s already shining pretty bright, and historically VP’s don’t get elected President (14 VP’s have become President, only 5 initially through elections, with two of those being Adams and Jefferson). And even if the VP seat was a path to future presidencies, would any rising star want to be associated with any Presidential administration right now? Let’s face it, a Romney or Perry presidency will have no greater chance of turning around the economy than an Obama presidency. No matter what, you aren’t coming out smelling like roses.
In short, Christie is too smart to be a VP.