Sydney Hostage Taker Man Haron Monis: Lone Wolf Terrorist, Or Lone Nut? Does It Matter?

Was Man Haron Monis a terrorist, or just a lone nut who had latched on to the rhetoric of ISIS to justify his own delusions? In the end, it hardly matters.

APTOPIX Australia Police Operation   TOK801

As I noted in an update to yesterday’s post about the hostage standoff in downtown Sydney, Australia, the hostage situation yesterday ended yesterday with a police raid that freed the vast majority of the hostages but, tragically, led to the death of two of the hostages along with the Iranian-born gunman who had initiated the sixteen hour siege. As police in Australian police continue their investigation, though, and law enforcement elsewhere prepares for potential copycat attacks while also searching for intelligence linking the gunman to outside forces, it remains unclear if the man responsible for the attacks was a lone wolf terrorist, or just a lone nut who latched on to ISIS to justify in his own mind to justify what has seemed lie a lifetime of violence and criminal acts:

The Iranian refugee identified as the man who held 17 people hostage in a Sydney cafe during a nearly 16-hour standoff was no stranger to Australian authorities. Before he allegedly turned to public violence on Monday, in a siege that ended when police stormed the cafe and killed 50-year-old Man Haron Monis, the self-styled Islamic cleric and “spiritual healer” already had a long criminal history, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

Last year, the paper noted, after a string of run-ins with Australian authorities, Monis was charged as an accessory to the murder of his ex-wife and mother of his two children. Noleen Hayson Pal, 30, was stabbed 18 times and set on fire outside a residence in western Sydney, according to the Daily Telegraph. Monis’s girlfriend, Amirah Droudis, was charged with Hayson Pal’s murder.

Most recently, Monis was charged with “more than 50 allegations of indecent and sexual assault,” according to the Herald. Those charges stemmed from incidents between 2000 and 2002, when he ran a clinic that offered “spiritual consultations” that included black magic, numerology and meditation. In January, a woman approached police and accused Monis of assaulting her at the clinic in 2002. That led to an investigation.

“The assaults are alleged to have been undertaken under the guise of a spiritual healing technique, and the man warned the woman not to tell anyone about them,” police said in a statement, according to the Herald.

On his own Web site, Monis posted graphic images of children that the site says were killed by U.S. and Australian airstrikes. “A terrorist act should be condemned whether it is committed by Muslims or non-Muslims,” he wrote.

Monis also compared himself to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and said he was the victim of a smear campaign waged by the Australian government and media. (In one Daily Telegraph headline, Monis was referred to as “‘Hate’ sheik.”)

His former attorney, Manny Conditsis, had a different take on his onetime client, describing Monis as an “isolated figure,” according to ABC Australia.

“His ideology is just so strong and so powerful that it clouds his vision for common sense and objectiveness,” Conditsis told the paper.

The lawyer theorized that Monis, facing numerous charges and pushed to the brink by poor treatment in jail, may have had little to lose.

“He was put through, let’s say, some very unpleasant events, involving matters of excrement over himself and his cell,” Conditsis told ABC Australia.

Iran-born Monis — who also went by the names Sheik Haron and Mohammad Hassan Manteghi, according to reports — had been granted political asylum in Australia, according to ABC.

He came to the attention of Australian authorities in 2009, when he was accused of sending dozens of offensive letters to the families of dead Australian soldiers, the relatives of British soldiers and the family of an government official who was killed in a bombing in Jakarta, according to the Herald.

At the moment, it does not appear that there were any real connections between Monis and any active terrorist organizations outside Australia, or any known terror cells inside the country either for that matter. To the extent that there are terror connections, then, they would seem to be more inspirational than anything else. Indeed, given Monis’s previous criminal history it seems likely that this is a guy susceptible to all sorts of apocalyptic death cult and that, to some extent, he may have latched on to fundamentalist/jihadist Islam as the a convenient crutch for whatever else it is that may actually be bothering him. At the very least, it seems rather obvious that his decision to take hostages at the cafe itself wasn’t very well thought through. True, he had access to weapons, which is no small feat in Australia where private gun ownership is virtually unheard of after the gun control laws enacted in recent years, but to the extent that he considered this a “terror” attack in the name of ISIS, he couldn’t even manage to bring an actual ISIS flag with him to the cafe and made obtaining such a flag one of his demands for releasing one of the hostages. Instead, he had a black flag with Arabic writing on it that apparently doesn’t even have any particularly jihadist meaning.

All of this brings up the legitimate question of what it means to say that something is “linked to terrorism” or a “terrorist” attack, a question that Steven Taylor asked in partial response to the post title I had chosen for my post about the hostage situation yesterday. As I noted in a comment to the post, it is a legitimate question, and I suppose that the answer I gave at the time is the best one for why I chose those particular words remains the best one available. In an era where we have seen several apparent “lone wolf” attacks by people who at least appear to have been inspired by rhetoric from ISIS or other organizations, such as the murder of the Canadian solider in Quebec, the attack on the Canadian Parliament and War Memorial, and a machete attack on a New York City Police Officer that occurred just days later, to be becoming more common. To that list we can add, arguably, the Boston Marathon bombing which does not appear to have had any foreign involvement at all. While it is true that none of these attacks were part of an organized terrorist campaign in the manner of the September 11th attacks, it seems foolish to ignore the fact that the people perpetrating these attacks are at least inspired by foreign based terrorism, especially since these kind of pin-prick lone wolf attacks are much harder to detect in advance and, due to the level of anxiety they could create if they started happening frequently, are quite capable of raising the level of public concern and fear to levels just as a high as it was after 9/11. Who would’ve expected an Islamist style attack in a chocolate cafe in Sydney, for example, or even in Ottawa at the War Memorial? A world where something like this becomes more common could be quite unpleasant in many respects, not the least of them being the impact it would have on the ever growing security state and our ever shrinking sense of personal liberty in public. In the end, then, it doesn’t matter if Man Haron Monis was a lone wolf terrorist intent on scoring a victory for ISIS or a lone nut who had latched on to Islamism for his own deluded reasons, the damage he did was the same in the end.

FILED UNDER: National Security, Terrorism
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. C. Clavin says:

    If only we had been a$$-raping someone…we could have prevented this.

  2. gVOR08 says:

    We have this one incident in Australia. You mention two in Canada and one in the US. We could add more, the Ft. Hood shooter, for instance. But we’re still looking at literally one-in-a-million. Meanwhile, the shooting of six people in PA by a white guy seems to be barely news. I hope we will respond to these “lone wolf/nut” incidents appropriately, but history says we’ll over-react, and inappropriately.

  3. bill says:

    quite a rap sheet, and he was still walking the streets in the “oh so enlightened” australia! just how did he acquire a gun anyway, they were banned?

    @gVOR08: wake up and smell the coffee- an ex-military guy freaking out during a dispute is not premeditated murder for whatever god he says influenced him.
    looks like the peaceful muslims are on a roll, killing school kids now. you must be proud.

  4. Tyrell says:

    @gVOR08: Actually the PA shooting is getting top line on the news that I am watching and was eclipsing the Sydney murders in the papers.

  5. Just Me says:

    I vote line wolf but that doesn’t make him less dangerous. Unlike some of the other killings there were signs this guy was dangerous and a nut. I’m curious why a man believed to be involved with the murder of his x wife and convicted of sexual assaults wasn’t being held for trial.

  6. Tyrell says:

    Certainly this nut should have been locked up in a prison or asylum and the key thrown away.

  7. Moosebreath says:

    @bill:

    ” just how did he acquire a gun anyway, they were banned?”

    Again, all guns aren’t banned, just automatics and semi automatics. If your premises are garbage, then your conclusions are also…

    “an ex-military guy freaking out during a dispute is not premeditated murder”

    An ex-military guy driving from township to township killing members of his ex-wife’s family is premeditated murder. Even if the first one can be viewed as something less (and that conclusion seems shaky at this time), he had plenty of time to calm down while driving to the next site.

  8. Slugger says:

    All of this happened at the other end of the earth from me and less 30 hours ago. If it is ok with all of you, I am going to wait for a few more facts to emerge before rendering my poorly thought out opinions.
    I did have a sardonic laugh at this guy asking for an ISIS flag. does not the terrorist are you backpack include a flag along with the gun, ammo, and ski mask,

  9. Neil Hudelson says:
  10. Neil Hudelson says:

    @gVOR08:

    Interestingly, while the PA shooter was on his killing spree, bill was claiming that a shooting spree like the one in Australia would NEVER happen in the U.S. as our well armed population would just take him out.

    Literally–at the exact time it was happening.

  11. Hal_10000 says:

    Lone wolf or connected, I agree it doesn’t matter. This is what radical Islamists do. We just saw a demonstration of that in Pakistan. They murder children. They murder women. They throw acid in faces. They kidnap women for rape marriages. Murdering his wife and sexually assaulting women was practically a job application for Al-Qaeda.

  12. al-Ameda says:

    @Neil Hudelson:

    Interestingly, while the PA shooter was on his killing spree, bill was claiming that a shooting spree like the one in Australia would NEVER happen in the U.S. as our well armed population would just take him out.

    By that reasoning, in this country, mass shooting sprees should never happen – Ft. Hood, Sandy Hook (oh wait, liberals have prevented passage of laws that would ensured that those kids and their teachers were well-armed).

  13. Dave D says:

    @bill: Weird Abbott confirmed he legally had a permit to have a gun.

    Abbott said Monis also had a gun license despite his long criminal history.

    Crazy since Australia “bans” guns that he legally had one. Oh wait that’s right he was a legal gun owner until he wasn’t.