Trump Halts New Sanctions Against Russia Over Syria

President Trump undercut his own Ambassador to the United Nations today by blocking the imposition of new sanctions on Russia.

During an appearance on CBS’s Face The Nation yesterday, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said that the Trump Administration would be imposing new sanctions against Russia over its support for the Assad regime and its efforts to deflect from Assad’s use of chemical weapons on Syria civilians. That attack, of course, led to the military action that the United States, France, and the United Kingdom took on Friday night against selected targets inside Syria, retaliation that at least seemed to suggest a much harsher tone on the part of the West toward Russia and its client state in Damascus. Notwithstanding Haley’s announcement, The Washington Post is reporting that President Trump has blocked the sanctions mere hours before they were set to be announced:

President Trump on Monday put the brakes on a preliminary plan to impose additional economic sanctions on Russia, walking back a Sunday announcement by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley that the Kremlin had swiftly denounced as “international economic raiding.”

Preparations to punish Russia anew for its support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government over the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria caused consternation at the White House. Haley said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” that sanctions on Russian companies behind the equipment related to Assad’s alleged chemical weapons attack would be announced Monday by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

But as officials in Moscow condemned the planned sanctions as overly punitive, Trump conferred with his national security advisers later Sunday and told them he was upset the sanctions were being officially rolled out because he was not yet comfortable executing them, according to several people familiar with the plan.

Administration officials said the economic sanctions were under serious consideration, along with other measures that could be taken against Russia, but said Trump had not given final authorization to implement them. Administration officials said Monday it was unlikely Trump would approve any additional sanctions without another triggering event by Russia, describing the strategy as being in a holding pattern.

Sometime after Haley’s comments on CBS, the Trump administration notified the Russian Embassy in Washington that the sanctions were not in fact coming, a Russian Foreign Ministry official said Monday.

The Trump team decided to publicly characterize Haley’s announcement as a misstatement. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement Monday: “We are considering additional sanctions on Russia and a decision will be made in the near future.”

Privately, another White House official said Haley got ahead of herself and made “an error that needs to be mopped up.”

But other administration officials expressed skepticism that Haley had merely misspoken. They said Haley is one of the most disciplined and cautious members of the Cabinet, especially when it comes to her public appearances. She regularly checks in with Trump personally to go over her planned statements before she sits for television interviews.

Haley issued no clarifying statement on Sunday after news organizations, including The Washington Post, reported prominently that the new sanctions would be announced Monday based on her comments to CBS.

Asked Monday morning why it had taken 24 hours for the administration to walk back Haley’s comments, one White House official said only that there had been confusion internally about what the plan was.


In the absence of a permanent secretary of state, Haley has been the face of American diplomacy, playing an especially prominent role over the past week as the Trump administration responded to the attack in Syria.

Haley said Sunday on CBS, “You will see that Russian sanctions will be coming down. Secretary Mnuchin will be announcing those on Monday, if he hasn’t already. And they will go directly to any sort of companies that were dealing with equipment related to Assad and chemical weapons used. And so I think everyone is going to feel it at this point. I think everyone knows that we sent a strong message, and our hope is that they listen to it.”

The Russians were listening. After Haley’s comments, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow that the sanctions were a U.S. ploy to oust Russia from international markets and constituted “undisguised attempts of unfair competition.”

“The sanction campaign against Russia is truly assuming the nature of an obsessive idea,” Peskov said, according to the Interfax news agency. “We still do not see these sanctions as lawful. We see them as going against international law.”

Peskov added, “Certainly, this cannot have any relation to and cannot be motivated by considerations of the situation in Syria or any other country . . . I would call this international economic raiding rather than something else.”

Unlike some other members of the Administration, Haley has not been one who has been known to speak prematurely on a subject, and this has been especially true regarding the comments she makes when speaking as the representative of the United States before the Security Council and in her media appearances. Given that, it seems unlikely that she was getting out ahead of what she had been told regarding the Administration’s future plans regarding Russian sanctions and that there was some other intervening act or communication may have caused the President to so obviously undercut the person who has, in the absence of a permanent Secretary of State, become the primary foreign policy of the Administration outside of the President himself. What seems more likely is that, for some reason, Trump decided that he didn’t want to go forward with a plan that would have had Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin announce new sanctions as early as today. What that may be is anyone’s guess.

This report, though, comes at the same time that The Washington Post is also reporting that Trump apparently erupted in anger at his aides when he learned that the United States was expelling far more Russian diplomats that many of our European allies in response to the poisoning of a former Russian spy on British soil:

President Trump seemed distracted in March as his aides briefed him at his Mar-a-Lago resort on the administration’s plan to expel 60 Russian diplomats and suspected spies.

The United States, they explained, would be ousting roughly the same number of Russians as its European allies — part of a coordinated move to punish Moscow for the poisoning of a former Russian spy and his daughter on British soil.

“We’ll match their numbers,” Trump instructed, according to a senior administration official. “We’re not taking the lead. We’re matching.”

The next day, when the expulsions were announced publicly, Trump erupted, officials said. To his shock and dismay, France and Germany were each expelling only four Russian officials — far fewer than the 60 his administration had decided on.

The president, who seemed to believe that other individual countries would largely equal the United States, was furious that his administration was being portrayed in the media as taking by far the toughest stance on Russia.

His briefers tried to reassure him that the sum total of European expulsions was roughly the same as the U.S. number.

“I don’t care about the total!” the administration official recalled Trump screaming. The official, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

Growing angrier, Trump insisted that his aides had misled him about the magnitude of the expulsions. “There were curse words,” the official said, “a lot of curse words.”

The incident reflects a tension at the core of the Trump administration’s increasingly hard-nosed stance on Russia: The president instinctually opposes many of the punitive measures pushed by his Cabinet that have crippled his ability to forge a close relationship with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin.

Taken in this context, Trump’s decision to put a stop to new sanctions against Russia over its Syria policy would seem to be motivated by the same sort of desire to mollify Putin that we’ve seen in the past. The best example of that, of course, can be seen in the fact that Trump has yet to implement the sanctions that Congress imposed in legislation passed at the end of 2016 and the Administration has yet to provide any explanation for why that is the case. While it’s true that Trump did call out Putin by name when he spoke initially about the chemical weapons attack, this has been notable as one of the only times during the entire Administration that he has done so. Now, he is once again holding back on sanctions that clearly seemed to be coming down the pike. Why that happening is something I’ll leave you, readers, to decide.

FILED UNDER: National Security, US Politics, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug Mataconis held a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010 and contributed a staggering 16,483 posts before his retirement in January 2020. He passed far too young in July 2021.


  1. OzarkHillbilly says:

    This is my shocked face ):-0

  2. Kathy says:

    I’m beginning to think the explanation about Trump’s whole approach to Russia begins with “pee” and ends with “tape.”

  3. michael reynolds says:

    I was gonna write something, but I have nothing to add to your excellent and succinct remark.

  4. michael reynolds says:

    BTW, waaaay OT, but Michael Cohen’s other client is. . . no, don’t peek! Sean Hannity. Yep. Hannity has the same fixer as Trump.

  5. Charon says:

    I am posting again a link I posted in the other thread – Michael Cohen traveling to Prague pretty definitively makes the case Trump and the Russians are working together.

    Washington Monthly, Nancy

  6. teve tory says:

    Wonder how many ‘Bortins ol Sean paid for.

  7. Daryl's other brother Darryl says:

    Sometime after Haley’s comments on CBS, the Trump Dennison administration notified his bosses at the Russian Embassy in Washington that the sanctions were not in fact coming


    @michael reynolds:
    I don’t watch FOX, ever, but I’m sure Hannity discloses his relationship with Cohen whenever he goes on a rant about the raid on Cohen’s office being a deep-state conspiracy aimed at destroying President Dennison…right?

  8. teve tory says:

    Judd Legum

    Verified account

    43m43 minutes ago
    UPDATE: Hannity’s radio show, scheduled to start at 3PM is a train wreck.

    First 10 mins was music and clips of the Comey interview.

    Then Hannity came on and said they’d continue to play the Comey interview while he though about whether to say something

  9. Daryl's other brother Darryl says:


    Michael Cohen traveling to Prague pretty definitively makes the case Trump and the Russians are working together.

    I’ve been paying close attention to that because, yes, it would be a pretty substantial nail in the coffin.
    However…I’m very cautious, because no other news outlet has confirmed the story. No one has debunked it either, and McClatchy is an outstanding news organization. Still…until it’s confirmed by others I am skeptical.

  10. CSK says:


    There’s probably more than the Pee Tape, don’t you think? Remember that Eric and Don Jr., on separate occasions, cheerfully volunteered the information that most of the family money was coming from Russia. And in the early 1990s, the Trump casino biz was nailed for laundering Russian gangster money.

  11. HelloWorld! says:

    A Syrian friend of mine said all the buildings our bombs hit were empty, and that word on the street in Syria is that Trump told Russia about the attack before it happened. Any way to validate that? Stuff like this makes me wonder…

  12. MarkedMan says:

    @Daryl’s other brother Darryl: Note that Cohen also did not deny it. That’s a pretty big tell.

  13. de stijl says:


    I think that is actually Anthony Davis’ shocked face.

    (Unless you, too, have a unibrow.)

  14. MarkedMan says:

    Let’s face facts. Trump is basically Putin’s b*tch. The more I think about this, the more it seems to me that Trump is getting truly, truly frightened that he is not delivering things of tangible value to his master. Putin thought he would play the Trump card (sorry, can’t help myself) by having the Trump administration bless the invasion in Crimea and give up the Ukraine and end all sanctions and so forth and instead he gets more sanctions.

    So is it time for Putin to stop trying to play that particular card in that particular way? If he can’t get an active benefit for Russia, maybe he can play it by doing harm to the US? And given that he no doubt has all kinds of incriminating and/or humiliating stuff on Trump, what better way to throw the US into confusion by letting it drip, drip, drip out?

  15. MarkedMan says:

    Oh, and by the way, the answer as to why it took 24 hours to walk sanctions back? It took that long for Putin to get through to Trump on the back channel and lay down the law.

  16. de stijl says:

    So Cohen has exactly three clients – he represented Trump (porn star payoff), Elliot Broidy (Playmate payoff), and … Sean Hannity.

    Gee, I wonder if there is another shoe about to drop IRT to Hannity.

  17. Daryl's other brother Darryl says:


    Note that Cohen also did not deny it.

    No…he has denied it. Says he was in LA but has offered no proof that I know of. Republicans refused to subpoena his credit card records.

  18. Kathy says:


    There’s probably more than the Pee Tape, don’t you think?

    I hope so. But with Trump you never can tell what’ll set him off. I mean, he had his press secretary lie about something as inconsequential as the size of the inauguration crowd.

  19. CSK says:


    Anything that undermines his self-image will set him off. Which means that practically anything can set him off. His ego is huge, but extremely fragile. Have we ever, ever had a presidential candidate, or a president, who had to assure us that he has a big dick? Literally assure us? And…Trump equates the size of his wallet with the size of his penis. He’s terrified that we’ll find out what we already know: that he’s a clown living on credit, with a tiny wallet and a tiny…

  20. Kathy says:


    Well, mores have changed.

    BTW, I think one possible scenario in the coming weeks, will be Mangolini bragging what a great deal he cut with Russia to have them interfere in the election. His base is so mesmerized, they may hail him as a political genius for it. It’s not like the Russians are pinkoliberalcommies, unlike the libtards, right?

  21. Gustopher says:

    Putin really has tamed President Trump, and made a nice little lapdog out of him.

  22. CSK says:


    I don’t think he’ll do that, because it would be an admission that he needed Russian help to win. And Trump never needs help. He wins on his own! No one wins like Donald Trump! He believes, or purports to believe, that his favorable poll number is 60%, and The Dishonest Media won’t report it.

  23. michael reynolds says:

    It seems like only yesterday our excellent Trumpaloon, @TM01 was saying, in reference to me, and I quote:

    Continue to spew his irrational, infantile “Trump is a Putin Puppet” nonsense again?
    Because no one saw that coming.

    Days of warning followed by a pointless bang-bang that accomplished fck-all and didn’t even make Assad or Putin frown, and the next day the Pisser-in-Chief is kneecapping his own UN ambassador, and behaving like the good wittle Putin puppet he is.

    TM01, apologist for a traitor. Because that’s what ‘conservatism’ is now.

  24. An Interested Party says:

    Wow, how the mighty have fallen…the GOP has gone from Reagan (Tear done this wall!) to this chump (Do you think Putin will…become my new best friend?)…I wonder how many Republicans enjoy having the head of their party being the lapdog to the leader of an aggressive foreign power? It certainly is becoming harder for them to deny that this idiot has a Russian connection…

  25. MarkedMan says:

    @Daryl’s other brother Darryl: I meant he hasn’t denied the new McClatchey story. You are correct that he did originally deny it. I wonder if he denied it to the Feds too?

  26. Kathy says:


    He might admit to needing help if/when Cohen admits to paying off Russian hackers in Trump’s stead. Or he might spin it as “insurance,” because he didn’t need help.

    I’m sure he’ll go to his grave without ever admitting he never intended to win the election.

  27. MarkedMan says:

    I just want to go on record here that to my recollection Michael Reynolds and I were the first to insist that the only explanation for Trump’s behavior was that he was actually owned by the Russians. We will be happy to claim our door prize on the way out…

  28. gVOR08 says:

    Booman, who writes for Washington Monthly, has a good, brief explanation of why Cohen in Prague is game over. And supports our most paranoid ravings about “collusion”.

  29. TM01 says:

    What we need is a Reset Button, more flexibility, and a Secretary of State willing to go fondle Putin’s….. Whatever.

  30. michael reynolds says:

    Oh, my god, that is such a wonderfully weak response. Reset button, mumble mumble, emails, mumble, Clinton Foundation, mumble mumble, Lock ‘er Up! And whaddabout? And whaddabout?

    All out of gas, TM01?