• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Pollster Prematurely Calls Florida, Virginia, And North Carolina For Romney

One pollster has decided that Mitt Romney winning Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina is so obvious that he’s not even going to poll there anymore:

Suffolk University pollster David Paleologos said Tuesday that he’s stopped polling Florida, Virginia and North Carolina because he’s already concluded that President Barack Obama will lose those swing states.

“In places like North Carolina, Virginia and Florida, we’ve already painted those red. We’re not polling any of those states again. We’re focusing on the remaining states,” Paleologos toldFox News’ Bill O’Reilly.

The remark surprised O’Reilly.

“That’s interesting. Let me stop you there. You’re convinced, your polling agency is convinced that Florida, North Carolina and Virginia are going to go for Romney?” O’Reilly said.

“That’s right, and here’s why. Before the debate the Suffolk poll had Obama winning 46 to 43 in the head-to-head number, a poor place to be for a couple of reasons,” said Paleologos, director of Suffolk University Political Research Center.

He continued: “Number one, his ballot test, his head-to-head number was under 47 [percent] before the debate and it’s very difficult when you have the known quantity, the incumbent, to claw your way up to 50. So that was a very, very poor place for him to be. And so we’re looking at this polling data not only in Florida but in Virginia and in North Carolina and it’s overwhelming.”

With less than a month to go before Election Day and the race so close, it seems odd to me for any pollster to call any of the battleground states for any of these candidates. As we learned from last week’s debate, there is so much that could happen between now and then that could effect the state of the race that it seems foolish to say that you know the race in a particular state is over unless that state happens to be someplace like California or Texas, which are obviously going to go for Obama and Romney respectively.

It makes even less sense when you look at the numbers.

In Florida, RealClearPolitics has the race essentially tied. Romney has a 0.7 point lead in the state, but that’s mostly because of the results of two polls from Rasmussen and WeAskAmerica, both polling firms known to lean Republican. Suffolk hasn’t polled in the state since the end of September, and that showed a three point Obama lead. We haven’t had any other polling since the debate othxr than that from Rasmussen and WAA, so it’s hard to say what the situation on the ground there actually is. Call the state for Romney? Way too early for that.

The race in Virginia is also essentially tied. In this case, the poll average shows Obama with a 0.3 point lead. Recent polling includes Rasmussen showing a one point Romney lead, We Ask America showing a three point Romney lead, and Public Policy Polling showing a four point lead for President Obama. There’s also a pre-debate poll from NBC News and Marist College showing the President with a two point lead. Much like Florida, it seems absurd to call the race at this point.

North Carolina is a bit different from the other two states. Here, Mitt Romney leads the RealClearPolitics Average by three points. However this is based largely on a single post-debate poll from Gravis Marketing showing Romney with a nine point lead, which is not consistent with any of the previous polling.  It’s also worth noting that Gravis is another polling firm with a decided Republican bias in its polling that has consistent been out of line with other polls since it started releasing polls a few months ago. There’s also pre-debate polling from Rasmussen and ARG that shows Romney leading, a pre-debate poll from SurveyUSA that has Obama up by two points, and a final pre-debate poll from PPP that has the race tied.  Unless it is replicated by other polling, the Gravis poll should be treated as an outlier for the moment. By all rights, this is a state where Romney should have been leading months ago, the fact that the President is keeping it competitive this late into the election cycle is something that Romney supporters should be concerned about, especially since the Obama campaign apparently isn’t putting that many resources into the state right now.

While I will not question Mr. Paleologos’s expertise, there’s simple no support for his assertion that these three states can now be called for Romney. He may end up winning these states in the end. Indeed, I still expect him to win North Carolina. However, the evidence to date is simply too sparse to make that call.

Related Posts:

About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May, 2010 and also writes at Below The Beltway. Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. Franklin says:

    Nate Silver has North Carolina at 80% for Romney, which is fairly solid. The other two are neck-and-neck right now, but we’re still waiting for the post-debate bump to shake out.

    Long story short, I’ll believe Nate first, all others second.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  2. Jay Dubbs says:

    University of North Florida just released a poll in Florida that has Obama up 4%. 49-45.

    But hey, its not like the campaigns thinks this is a competitive state, its not like us Floirda residents can’t go 5 minutes without seeing an ad, right?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  3. Geek, Esq. says:

    His own polls show Obama ahead in two of those states.

    And he ignores the margin for error–Obama could be ahead 48-42 in Florida under his own poll’s findings.

    And he places such massive faith in one poll from the field that it’s considered unassailable and used to allocate resources.

    Put a giant asterisk by anything produced by Suffolk from now on. This is major hackery.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  4. cd6 says:

    “That’s right, and here’s why. Before the debate the Suffolk poll had Obama winning 46 to 43 in the head-to-head number

    what is this i don’t even

    “Our last poll showed Obama winning, therefore, he is losing”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  5. Scott says:

    Maybe there are so many people polling in the those places that he can’t make money so he’s pulling out. After all, none of this is free.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  6. C. Clavin says:

    The Princeton Election Consortium has FL leaning Blue, VA (and OH) as a toss-up, and NC tilting Red (80%).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Neil Hudelson says:

    I think this pollster is absolutely correct and I hope the Romney campaign listens to his sage wisdom by pulling all resources immediately in order to concentrate anywhere else.

    Highly-rated. Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1

  8. Curtis says:

    Stop the presses! A hack said something stupid! Stop the presses!

    I disagree with your assertion that Romney should have wrapped up North Carolina months ago. Yes, it was the state most narrowly carried by the president. However, the demographic shifts there are all in favor of the Democrats at this point.

    Now, if Romney is going to be competitive, he needs to win North Carolina. But even a three point or so national lead for the president should put the Tarheel state very much up for grabs. We are not talking about Utah here.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  9. legion says:

    I wonder if Jack Welch sent a horse’s head to him…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  10. Anderson says:

    Note to self: disregard Suffolk polls.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  11. Jen says:

    Meanwhile, Buzzfeed has a post up in which the guy of the “unskewing the polls” fame claims that his site has caused pollsters to skew their polls less, thus Romney’s bump.

    Just when things couldn’t get any wackier, they seem to.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Catfish says:

    One thing I have noticed is a total lack of enthusiasm for Obama compared to four years ago. In my visiting of local fairs and fall festivals, at every one of them I have seen a table set up that is giving out Romney materials, selling Romney shirts, and supporting local republicans. As I drive around, I have not seen one Obama yard sign or bumper stickers compared to numerous for Romney. It’s as if Obama has packed it in. Many churches are organizing get out the vote activities and will even give people a ride to the polling places. Churches have sponsored voter registration days and meet the candidates programs. It looks like it will be a big turnout.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. Curtis says:

    @Catfish: Catfish, if you don’t mind me asking, where do you live?

    I am in San Antonio, and my experience is the exact opposite. Especially after Palin joined the ticket, I saw dozens and dozens of McCain/Palin stickers and signs, almost as many as for Obama/Biden. This year, there are way fewer for both candidates than 4 years ago. But I could count on one hand the number of Romney stickers or signs I have seen.

    In the grand scheme of things, what is happening in Texas isn’t really relevant, but I just thought it interesting how different our experiences of this election are.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Catfish says:

    @Curtis: Thanks. This is in NC.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0