Hamid Karzai Blasts United States In Farewell Address

Before leaving office, Hamid Karzai is once again biting that hand that has fed him for the past decade.

Hamid Karzai IEC Speech

Hamid Karzai will be leaving office in the coming weeks, making way for President Ashraf Ghani, who will be serving in office under a power sharing arrangement with his rival in the recently concluded Presidential election, Abdullah Abdullah. but he’s not leaving quietly. In addition to the manner in which he has tried to assert influence over the controversies the followed the election and continuing to block final ratification of the Status of Forces Agreement between Afghanistan and the United States, yesterday he gave a farewell address in which he blasted the very people that were responsible for putting him in office in the first place:

KABUL, Afghanistan — In his nearly 13 years as the leader of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai’s most memorable public stances always seemed driven by some deep emotion, and an almost compulsive need to express it. There was heartbreak for families killed by errant airstrikes, outrage at the scheming of hostile neighbors, palpable longing to preside over a peaceful end to the Taliban insurgency.

On Tuesday, though he delivered a farewell speech in a loose and sometimes jocular way, there was, again, no doubt of the emotion that inspired his words: bitterness at what he saw as an American betrayal of Afghanistan.

“America did not want peace for Afghanistan, because it had its own agendas and goals here,” he told an audience of hundreds of cabinet and staff members at the presidential palace in Kabul, warning them not to trust the Americans. “I have always said this: that if America and Pakistan want peace, it is possible to bring peace to Afghanistan.”

Mr. Karzai’s denunciation of the United States came in terms that had become wearily familiar to the diplomats watching the televised speech from the heavily fortified American Embassy just a few blocks and many blast walls from the palace. But what the president did not say, omitting any recognition of the more than 2,000 American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars the United States expended in fighting the Taliban, may have grated more.

Instead, Mr. Karzai pointedly praised the assistance of countries that had given notably less, like India. He did not mention the sacrifices of other Western allies, nor of his own security forces, who have lost an estimated 15,000 men killed in a war that seems unlikely to end soon.

“I want to thank those countries who genuinely supported us,” Mr. Karzai said. “Western countries had their personal interest — the Western countries and the United States had their own personal goal.”

The departing American ambassador, James B. Cunningham, dispensed with diplomatic niceties afterward, telling Western journalists that Mr. Karzai’s remarks were ungrateful and ungracious.

“It makes me kind of sad. I think his remarks, which were uncalled-for, do a disservice to the American people, and dishonor the sacrifices that Americans have made here,” Mr. Cunningham said. “By not recognizing the many contributions that Americans have made, and our partners, that’s the part that’s ungracious and ungrateful.”

This isn’t exactly out of character for Karzai, of course. In the decade that he has been in power as President, he has frequently engaged in what can often only be called bizarre rants against the United States and others for reasons that make no sense other than, perhaps, the fact that he is appealing to a domestic constituency. Both of his elections were marred by allegations of fraud and corruption, but little was made of it because it was in the interests of the United States and our mission in Afghanistan that he stay in power. It’s also been clear from the beginning that there was a high degree of corruption among the President, his family, and his inner political circle that included bribes from local chieftains and from the Islamic Republic of Iran.  On more than one occasion, he has called for the U.S. to reduce its presence in his country, a position which once ‘astonished’ General David Petraeus, to saying that the U.S. led coalition wasn’t doing enough to help Kabul in the government’s war against the Taliban. He’s accused the United States and the rest of the coalition of colluding against him in remarks that can only be described as paranoid, and most recently he said that Afghanistan didn’t need any American troops to stay after 2014 even though pretty much every other political leader in Kabul thinks otherwise. Taken in that context, Karzai’s rant yesterday fits a long established pattern.

I’ve long been critical of the war in Afghanistan. In the beginning, it was indeed the “good war” that President Obama characterized it as when he was running for office in 2008 in that we were pursuing the people responsible for the worst non-military attack on the American homeland in history and who had promised to conduct more attacks if they were able to do so. At some point, however, that war switched from being about al Qaeda and turned into an effort to prop up the Karzai government in Kabul and fight his war against the Taliban for him. We did this, at least in part, because it as allegedly in our interests to try to create a stable Afghanistan that would no longer be a haven for terrorists, but in the process we managed to ally ourselves with a corrupt, mercurial politician who was playing all sides against each other. Now, as he sails off into a retirement that will no doubt see him spending more time at a penthouse in Dubai than on the ground in Kabul, he has engaged in another irrational attack on the people who are responsible for every benefit he has received over the past 13 years. Aside from the lack of gratitude that this demonstrates, it’s yet another signal of exactly the kind of person we were dealing with. Good riddance to him, and one hopes we’ll get ourselves out of that country before it causes us even more problems.

FILED UNDER: National Security, Terrorism, , ,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug Mataconis held a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010 and contributed a staggering 16,483 posts before his retirement in January 2020. He passed far too young in July 2021.


  1. Rob Prather says:

    “America did not want peace for Afghanistan, because it had its own agendas and goals here,”

    Yes, that was money and lives well spent.

  2. Slugger says:

    I am not so sure that we should dismiss Mr. Karzai out of hand. We have spent ten years and two thousand lives there. It would certainly be interesting to hear what the people of Afghanistan think about all this. If Mr. Karzai is purely a selfserving corrupt official, then I would expect him to appeal to undiluted popular views rather than making a sober and balanced judgement. And if this is what Afghani think in their heart of hearts after our efforts, we should be aware of their assessment before we sink further into interventions in that part of the world.

  3. Mu says:

    I guess Karzai got confirmation that Dubai is settling for a 10% cut on all money transactions to their banks in exchange for permanent asylum. He doesn’t even have to take the “US Federal Reserve” wrappers off first.

  4. DonVito says:

    I would think he would be at least somewhat thankful for all the money he’s taken from the US to became a multimillionaire. Still, I don’t think anyone could truly bring peace to Afghanistan. Anyone who has ever read Carvans by Michener would know that. The closest we came was with Major Jim Gant who was on the right track before his dramatic fall.

    Reading this old article on Wikileaks, it doesn’t seem most of our allies were too fond of him.


  5. JohnMcC says:

    “If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principle difference between a dog and man.” Mark Twain

    Karzai has become Nguyen Cao Ky. Who by the way ended his life in communist VietNam advocating reconciliation.

  6. John D'Geek says:

    @JohnMcC: You beat me to the Twain quote!

  7. PAUL HOOSON says:

    Na Na Na, Hey Hey, Goodbye to one of the most corrupt world leaders. A pure disappointment despite all that the U.S. has done with foreign aid and support for this country.

  8. President Camacho says:

    The no assassinations executive order doesn’t apply once you are no longer president. Okay, kidding. But man does this guy piss me off. Corrupt as they come. Literally receives bags of cash from us and then kicks us in the nuts every chance he gets. Guaranteed to be requesting asylum in a western European nation within the year and living large on our taxpayer dollars. Thanks Bush. I guess I need to thank the current admin for continuing the policies. Time to go bang my head into the wall for a while.

  9. It’s an remarkable post in favor of all the internet viewers; they will get
    benefit from it I am sure.

  10. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything. However just
    imagine if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this website could certainly be one of the very best in its field.
    Fantastic blog!

  11. This paragraph gives clear idea in support of the new visitors of blogging,
    that in fact how to do running a blog.

  12. Dave Schuler says:

    I don’t find what he said that outrageous. We didn’t invade and occupy Afghanistan for the Afghans but for our own purposes. Although it does provide aid the U. S. military is not a heavily armed aid organization.

  13. Tony W says:

    While Obama may have called it the good war, it certainly was not a war designed to punish those responsible for 911 – Saudi Arabia stands just as powerful and repressive as ever.

    On a side note, the spam is getting as incomprehensible as Republican talking points lately.

  14. J-Dub says:

    @Dave Schuler: And if he were as corrupt as people are saying then all the money we gave him would have kept him from speaking his mind. Seems to show that he can’t be bought, in my opinion.

  15. J-Dub says:

    Corrupt as they come. Literally receives bags of cash from us and then kicks us in the nuts every chance he gets.

    Isn’t that the definition of “not corrupt”? Corrupt would be “literally receives bags of cash from us and then does and says whatever we tell him”.

  16. President Camacho says:

    Good point. This just sucks

  17. Lenoxus says:

    @J-Dub: That’s a very good point. He may be plenty corrupt in other respects, but this specific thing demonstrates an odd sort of integrity.