Wife Of Duncan Hunter Jr. Pleads Guilty, Will Testify Against Him

Congressman Duncan Hunter Jr's defense of campaign law violations against him suffered a big setback yesterday when his wife and co-Defendant entered into a plea agreement with prosecutors.

The wife of Congressman Duncan Hunter Jr., who faces charges along with her husband in connection with what appears to be a multi-million dollar diversion of funds from Hunter’s campaign fund to pay personal expenses, has dealt her husband’s legal case a significant setback by pleading guilty to the charges against her, raising the possibility that she could be a witness against him if he takes his case trial:

The wife of Representative Duncan Hunter of California pleaded guilty on Thursday to one criminal count in a case in which she and her husband were accused of using more than $200,000 in campaign funds for personal use — including lavish dinners, vacations, private school for their children, and even plane tickets for their pet rabbit.

Margaret Hunter, who has also agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, admitted in Federal District Court in San Diego that she had conspired with her husband to violate campaign finance law.

“I am deeply remorseful, and I apologize,” Ms. Hunter, 44, said through her lawyers, Tom McNamara and Logan Smith. “I have accepted full responsibility for my conduct.” She will face up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine when she is sentenced on Sept. 16, about a week after Representative Hunter is to go on trial.

Mr. Hunter, a former Marine in Iraq and Afghanistan who was first elected in 2008 to a seat held by his father, did not attend the hearing on Thursday. But in a statement, he said that the case was politically motivated.

“I do not have the full details of Margaret’s case, but it’s obvious that the Department of Justice went after her to get to me for political reasons,” he said. “The fact remains that this entire matter should have been handled by the Federal Election Commission.”

In a statement before the hearing, Gregory Vega, Representative Hunter’s lawyer, said Ms. Hunter’s guilty plea would not have an immediate impact on his client’s case.

“At this time, that does not change anything regarding Congressman Hunter,” Mr. Vega said, according to The San Diego Tribune. “There are still significant motions that need to be litigated.”

Mr. Hunter, a Republican, has sought to blame his wife for the corruption charges, saying in a 2018 Fox News interview that she was responsible for the couple’s finances.

“Whatever she did, that will be looked at, too, I’m sure,” he said. “I didn’t do it. I didn’t spend any money illegally.”

Mr. Hunter has also responded to the charges by blaming a “deep state” conspiracy.

The origin of all this, of course, lies in the indictment issued against Hunter last August just before the start of the General Election campaign. As I noted at the time, the charges against the couple appear to be well-documented and there doesn’t seem to be much question that what they did was illegal. Even back then, Hunter’s response to the charges was to blame his wife and an alleged conspiracy against him, for what happened and vowed to fight the charges. It’s also notable that, despite the charges, Hunter was re-elected in November although it was by a somewhat narrower margin than he has seen in the past.

In her plea agreement, which I’ve embedded below, Ms. Hunter agrees to cooperate fully with prosecutors in their investigation and in future court proceedings against other Defendants, implicitly including her husband. The agreement also includes language in which Hunter acknowledges and swears to the truth of the factual basis for the claims against her and her husband, something that will be incredibly damaging to her husband’s defense. It also appears from the Plea Agreement that prosecutors have obtained the coverage of the Treasurer of Hunter’s previous campaigns for office, who will apparently testify regarding the disbursements that were made from campaign funds for personal expenses incurred by the Hunters that were entirely unrelated to the campaign.

Although not stated in the news coverage, one assumes from the news coverage that the Hunters are currently estranged and are, at the very least, pursuing very different legal strategies. Where Ms. Hunter has, wisely it appears to me, chosen to cooperate with prosecutors in exchange for a lighter sentence, Congressman Hunter appears to be prepared to fight these charges notwithstanding what appears to be the overwhelming evidence against him and despite the fact that his alleged co-conspirator has apparently agreed to testify against him. This not only seems like an unwise move on this part but is made even more questionable by the fact that his defense doesn’t seem to be about questioning the evidence the prosecution has made clear in the indictment issued against him. Instead, he appears intent on arguing that he is the victim of some sort of “Deep State” conspiracy.

Good luck with that one, Duncan.

Here’s the plea agreement:

United States v. Margaret H… by on Scribd

FILED UNDER: Congress, Crime, Law and the Courts, US Politics,
Doug Mataconis
About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May 2010. Before joining OTB, he wrote at Below The BeltwayThe Liberty Papers, and United Liberty Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Hell hath no fury as a woman thrown under her husband’s campaign bus.

    ReplyReply
  2. MarkedMan says:

    And not surprisingly Duncan Hunter is taking the Guarneri defense where he is completely innocent and all these charges are by lying democrats and deep state schemers.

    ReplyReply
  3. Jen says:

    Duncan Hunter is almost a caricature of a sleazy politician at this point. In addition to this…mess of illegality, he also stated that sure, he killed civilians when he was stationed in Iraq–only on accident of course.

    He is a gross, unethical, and thoroughly appalling person and I hope they throw the book at him. Of course the district will remain in Republican hands, but honestly, his lack of remorse or acceptance of his guilt is just unreal.

    ReplyReply
  4. OzarkHillbilly says:

    @Jen:

    Of course the district will remain in Republican hands, but honestly, his lack of remorse or acceptance of his guilt is just unreal.

    Correction Jen: In light of his re-election, his lack of remorse or acceptance of his guilt is just very Republican.

    ReplyReply
  5. steve says:

    His wife will now be declared a liberal.

    Steve

    ReplyReply
  6. MarkedMan says:

    @steve: I don’t think he needs to go that far. The standard will work fine for a Republican: “Bitchez be lyin”

    ReplyReply
  7. Just nutha ignint cracker says:

    Dude, Dude, Dude. Your party is in control of the Senate and the Senate is currently packing the court system with as many partisan hacks as they can find as fast as they can (there’s been a decades-long shortfall in judge appointments, dontchaknow?). What does it tell you that under these circumstances, they’re still going after you?
    Dude, you effed up, real bad. Sad. Pathetic.

    ReplyReply

Speak Your Mind

*