• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Sanctions Against Iran Partially Lifted As Compliance With Nuclear Deal Is Confirmed By IAEA

Iran Nuclear Deal Congress

The United States and several European nations have officially lifted a series of sanctions against Iran after the International Atomic Energy Association certified that the it had complied with the initial requirements of the nuclear deal reached last summer:

VIENNA — The United States and European nations lifted oil and financial sanctions on Iran and released roughly $100 billion of its assets after international inspectors concluded that the country had followed through on promises to dismantle large sections of its nuclear program.

This came at the end of a day of high drama that played out in a diplomatic dance across Europe and the Middle East, just hours after Tehran and Washington swapped long-held prisoners.

Five Americans, including a Washington Post reporter, Jason Rezaian, were released by Iran hours before the nuclear accord was implemented. The detention of one of the released Americans, Matthew Trevithick, who had been engaged in language studies in Tehran when he was arrested, according to his family, had never been publicly announced.

Early on Sunday, a senior United States official confirmed that “our detained U.S. citizens have been released and that those who wished to depart Iran have left.” The Washington Post also released a statement confirming that Mr. Rezaian and his wife, Yeganeh Salehi, had left Iran.

“Iran has undertaken significant steps that many people — and I do mean many — doubted would ever come to pass,” Secretary of State John Kerry said Saturday evening at the headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which earlier issued a report detailing how Iran had shipped 98 percent of its fuel to Russia, dismantled more than 12,000 centrifuges so they could not enrich uranium, and poured cement into the core of a reactor designed to produce plutonium.

But Mr. Kerry was clearly energized by the release of the Americans, an issue he took up on the edges of almost every nuclear negotiation, and pursued in separate, secret talks that many involved in the nuclear issue were only vaguely aware were happening.

(…)

With the start of the so-called implementation day, the day that the accord goes fully into operation, the structures are finally in place for Tehran to re-engage with the world after decades of isolation.

But even in a week that started with the release of 10 sailors who drifted into Iranian waters — the Defense Department still has not provided an explanation of how that happened — and ended with a prisoner swap that seemed drawn from the pages of the Cold War, it was far from clear whether Tehran would choose to re-engage — at least very quickly.

In Tehran and Washington, political battles are still being fought over the merits and dangers of moving toward normal interchanges between two countries that have been avowed adversaries for more than three decades. But Mr. Kerry suggested that the nuclear deal had broken the cycle of hostility, enabling the secret negotiations that led up to the hostage swap. It was far from a sure thing: Just weeks ago, Iran was demanding the release of nearly 20 Iranians convicted or indicted in the United States; an administration official said that number had been whittled down to seven, but even that still rankled some.

“Critics will continue to attack the deal for giving away too much to Tehran,” said R. Nicholas Burns, who started the sanctions against Iran that were lifted Saturday as the No. 3 official in the State Department during the George W. Bush administration. “But the fact that Iran’s nuclear ambitions will be effectively frozen for the next 10 to 15 years is a real advantage for us,” he said, adding that “it was achieved by tough-minded diplomacy and not war.”

(…)

Mr. Kerry emerged to tell reporters he had reached the goals he has talked about for two years. “Each of the pathways that Iran had to a nuclear weapon have been verifiably closed down,” he declared. Noting that Tehran has frozen much of its activity during the negotiations, he responded to critics of the deal — including, without naming them, the Republican presidential candidates — who say that Iran will immediately cheat.

We have now two years of compliance under our belt,” he said. “Obviously, past performance does not guarantee future results.” But, he argued, “we know without doubt that there is not a challenge in the entire region that wouldn’t become much more complicated if Iran had the ability” to produce nuclear weapons.”

But Iran has something it desperately needs: Billions in cash, at a time oil shipments have been cut by more than half because of the sanctions, and below $30-a-barrel prices mean huge cuts in national revenue.

Just how much cash is a matter of dispute. A senior American official said Saturday that Iran will be able to access about $50 billion of a reported $100 billion in holdings abroad, though others have used higher estimates. The official said Iran will likely need to keep much of those assets abroad to facilitate international trade.

The Obama administration on Saturday also removed 400 Iranians and others from its sanctions list and took other steps to lift selected restrictions on interactions with Iran. Another 200 people, however, will remain on the sanctions list under for other reasons, including terrorist activities, human rights abuses, involvement in civil wars in Syria or Yemen or ties to the country’s ballistic missile program.

Under the new rules put in place, the United States will no longer sanction foreign individuals or firms for buying oil and gas from Iran. The American trade embargo remains in place, but the government will permit certain limited business activities with Iran, such as selling or purchasing Iranian food and carpets and American commercial aircraft and parts.

It is an opening to Iran that represents a huge roll of the dice, one that will be debated long after Mr. Obama he has built his presidential library. It is unclear what will happen after the passing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has protected and often fueled the hardliners — but permitted these talks to go ahead.

What the IAEA certification means, of course, is that Iran has met the first round of requirements under the nuclear deal that was finalized this summer and put into effect in early fall. This means that they have begun the process of shutting down one of the their primary research reactors, a process which required them to pour concrete into the core of the reactor to ensure that it cannot easily be restarted as well as other steps that, at least in the short and medium term are intended to make proceeding down the road to a nuclear weapons difficult if not impossible. In exchange for this, Iran is gaining access to funds that have been frozen in some cases for years. For the most part, these funds consist of money that is rightfully owed to the government of Iran or to Iranian companies for goods or services provided to foreign nations or bank deposits in the names of those entities. These funds have been frozen due to the sanctions imposed by the United States, Europe, and the United Nations. The certification also means that Iran will regain access to the international banking system as well as the ability to sell its oil on the open market going forward. That last item is an interesting one given the fact that world oil prices have been plunging in recent weeks in response to signs of a weakening economy in China that would lead to lower demand for energy from that part of the world. Many oil analysts believe that Iran putting its considerable reserves back into the world market will likely mean that prices will continue to fall, and that they’re likely to stay low for some time to come. While this development will not be welcomed by the oil industry, and could have interesting impacts in nations that rely on oil as their primary sources of income such as Saudi Arabia, it could have a positive impact here in the United States and Europe as money typically spent on energy and transportation is freed up for other purposes.

Going forward, of course, the question will be whether Iran is continuing to comply with its obligations under the nuclear agreement, including the provisions that permit the IAEA to inspect facilities that the Iranians had previously said would be off-limits to foreigners. To the extent that they continue to comply, then it will arguably be the case that one can call the nuclear deal a success but it is obviously far too early to say what will happen in that regard. Additionally, it’s worth keeping in mind that the issues between the West and Iran are not limited to Iran’s nuclear program and that much work remains to be done. For one thing, there are some sanctions related to the nuclear deal remain in place until further compliance with the agreement is certified in the future. Additionally, there are a completely separate set of sanctions against Iran due to its attempts to develop ballistic missiles, including a new round of sanctions that the United States imposed today in response to yet another Iranian test of ballistic missile technology.Additionally, Iran continues to hold foreigners as prisoners on trumped up charges, continues to support terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas, and continues to support the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria. Across the Persian Gulf, tensions between Iran and its Sunni neighbors in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States remain at a high level after the execution early this month of a prominent Shia critic of the Saudi regime. Clearly, normalizing Iran’s relationship with the rest of the world will be an ongoing process. However, as today’s events, along with the recent quick resolution of the incident involving ten American sailors and the release of Jason Rezaian and other detained Americans shows, there at least appears to be a line of communication open that could allow for the process to resolve those disputes to be resolved some day. Hopefully, that’s a good sign for the future.

Related Posts:

About Doug Mataconis
Doug holds a B.A. in Political Science from Rutgers University and J.D. from George Mason University School of Law. He joined the staff of OTB in May, 2010 and also writes at Below The Beltway. Follow Doug on Twitter | Facebook

Comments

  1. anjin-san says:

    I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve seen “Why is Obama giving Iran billions while our vets sleep on the streets” posts on Facebook. And of course there is the “Obama is giving Iran nukes” crowd.

    Some of these are posted by people who I’ve know since I was a kid. In a few cases, I’ve explained “It’s already their money” “Obama is not doing anything on his own, it’s a multinational agreement” and so on.

    Might as well shout into the wind. In ever case, the person I’m talking to simply gets mad when their bad information is contradicted. In a few cases, I got unfriended.

    I’m not terribly optimistic about the future when facts are becoming meaningless to huge portions of our society.

    Highly-rated. Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 0

  2. CSK says:

    You may be hearing it here first, but Donald Trump is claiming credit for ending the hostage crisis. I am not making this up.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

  3. Ron Beasley says:

    Modern Republicans hate diplomacy because ;
    1) The Obama Administration did it
    2) I’ts non manly
    3) There is no money to be made

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0

  4. stonetools says:

    Thanks to Diplomacy? Thanks to Obama’s diplomacy!

    Obama, through his very able SoS, has been steadily and coolly pursuing a course of negotiations with Iran, despite a steady drumbeat of demagoguery from conservatives who proclaimed unconditional disaster from day one, and berating Obama for being weak not to simply demand total surrenders on pain of war.
    now after what looks like to all objective observers to ao be a series of diplomatic victories, those right wingers ave been desperately trying to spin this as somehow a loss from America. Seems like the usual suspects would have preferred a war instead, , although they don’t quite say that. Instead, they seem to be proclaiming the Underpants Gnomes of theory of international relations, namely:

    1. Talk tough to Iran
    2.?????
    3. Iran surrenders.

    If this is the standard Republican approach to international relations, and it certainly appears to be, then war ( and major war) is inevitable next time a Republican-any Republican-becomes President. “Independents” who claim that that avoiding interventions abroad should be central to foreign policy should take note of this. It’s one thing to say that Clinton is slightly more hawkish than Obama, and Sanders less so. It’s another, by your vote or non-vote, to put the Presidency in the hands of the representative of a party who thinks that international diplomacy is about ordering nations to make unilateral concessions , and going to war if they don’t. That’s a vote for making war more likely.
    In the meantime, let’s enjoy and defend what is looking more and more like the most productive second term of a President, foreign policy wise, since WW2. More like this, please.

    Highly-rated. Helpful or Unhelpful: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 1

  5. DrDaveT says:

    @anjin-san:

    I’m not terribly optimistic about the future when facts are becoming meaningless to huge portions of our society.

    Reality is complicated. Complicated is annoying, and frustrating, and hard. Americans are all about simple, and accommodating, and hassle-free, and (above all) low-effort.

    We are doing this to ourselves through our unique combination of economic affluence and local control of education. We don’t have to work hard, or think hard, or untangle the complicated… so we don’t.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3

  6. Slugger says:

    I would think that a rapprochement between the US and Iran should be easy. Not that long ago we spent a lot of money and lives to get rid of their enemy, Saddam Hussein, and replace him with one of their coreligionist as ruler of Iraq. Surely they must appreciate the effort we made on their behalf.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

  7. OzarkHillbilly says:

    Additionally, Iran continues to hold foreigners as prisoners on trumped up charges, continues to support terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas, and continues to support the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria.

    Hmmmm… Additionally, Saudi Arabia continues to hold foreigners as prisoners on trumped up charges, it’s citizens continue to support terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS*, and the country continues to engage in an illegal war in Yemen.

    *and yeah, I’m saying the Royal family Saud is not only OK with it, but encourages it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

  8. Tyrell says:

    I have reluctantly believed that this agreement may not be the best, but does provide a framework for policing and intervention if Iran violates it. There are other countries in on this too and they need to do their part. Obviously verification is important, and that needs to be anytime anywhere, done by our scientists and military. Iran also needs to make some big reforms concerning human rights and freedom for their people.
    I will continue to study this agreement, including the fine print, side deals, cheat sheets, and opinions of experts.
    Hopefully Iran’s leaders are finally straightening out their act.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4

  9. C. Clavin says:

    @Tyrell:

    I will continue to study this agreement

    As well as watch Nickelodean every night for the black and white re-runs of when this country was magical…..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  10. Barry says:

    Doug: …continues to support terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas, and continues to support the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria.”

    Meanwhile, Saudia Arabia supported Al Qaida (and likely still does), and backs ISIS.

    As for Assad, what seems to be the strongest faction against him is…….. ISIS.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

  11. Tony W says:

    @Barry: Are you suggesting conservatives should value intellectual consistency?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  12. Gromitt Gunn says:

    The GOP has systematically primaried its leading foreign policy voices out of Congress since 2010. Foreign policy pragmatists withn the GOP have been declared personal non RINO since the run up to Iraq post 9/11.

    At this point, pragmatic foreign policy is the sole domain of the Democratic Party. One can debate whether or not that is a good thing (I do not think it is), but the days when the GOP could be relied upon for sober analysis of costs and benefits exist only in the rear view mirror.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  13. David M says:

    @Gromitt Gunn:

    It’s getting more worrying that the opposition to something like the Iran deal has stopped being blind rage-induced ODS, and crossed over the line where the GOP can’t even recognize what is good for the United States anymore.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

  14. KM says:

    @anjin-san:

    I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve seen “Why is Obama giving Iran billions while our vets sleep on the streets” posts on Facebook.

    Whenever I see crap like that, I treat it like the whole “Don’t Abort, Adopt!” crowd – I ask how many they’ve taken care of personally. How many vets have you recommended for a job? How many have you invited into your home for a meal, a good night’s sleep on a frigid eve? Do you work in food kitchens, help organize drives, given rides to interviews, etc?

    Or do you give a buck or two and call that involvement? What’s that again about the best charity being private?

    These people are johnny-come-latelys: didn’t give a crap a week ago and most likely won’t give a crap next week. They see a commercial, feel bad, give $17 bucks and get a warm glow that they “saved a vet”. Homeless veterans are a continuing issue a single act of charity won’t cure; it will take time, effort, social change and willpower, not just “billions”.

    But hey, Thanks Obama!!! sounds catchier…..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  15. Hi there! This post couldn’t be written much better!
    Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He always kept talking about this. I’ll send this article to him.
    Pretty sure he’s going to have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

  16. Mount Sanqingshan National Park, a 22,950 ha property located in the wext of the Huyaiyu mountain range in the northeast of Jiangxi Province (in the east of central China) has bden inscribed for its exceptjonal scenic quality, marked by the concentration of fantastically shaped pillars annd peaks: 48 granite peaks and 89 granite pillars, many of which resemkble human or animal silhouettes.
    The natural beauty of the 1,817 metre high Mount Huaiyu
    is further enhanced by the juxtaposition of granite features with the vegetation and particular meteorological conditions which make for an ever-changingand arresting landscape
    with bright halos oon clouds and white rainbows. Thhe area is subject to a
    combination of subtropical monsoonal and maritime influences and forms an island of temperate forest above thee surrounding subtropical landscape.
    It also features forests aand numerous waterfalls, some off them 60 metres in height, lakes and springs.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  17. So, have an excellent time Along with the spins in your io and android system and this
    new and really appealing Pirate Kings hack.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  18. Rae says:

    I constantly spent my half an hour to read this blog’s
    content all the time along with a cup of coffee.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  19. Jeremy’s was the closest to the right amount, which showed that aas an owner, he knows how to keep his profits in check and should
    be there to watch his bottom line. When people try to absorb tooo much
    information all at once, thyeir brains can become overwhelmed.
    The topmost line below the appliication title is known as the Menu Bar.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  20. Meridith says:

    magnificent points altogether, you just won a logo new reader.
    What would you suggvest about your publish that you simply made some days
    ago? Any sure?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  21. buy barcodes says:

    I have read several excellent stuff here.
    Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise
    how so much effort you set to create any such fantastic informative web site.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  22. Appreciating the commitment you put into your website and detailed important information you offer.
    It’s nice to come across a blogging every from time to time that isn’t
    the same old rehashed material. Great read! I’ve cite your site and I’m including your bookmarks to my
    Feed reader account.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  23. moneylenders says:

    Fantastic website. A lot of helpful info here.
    I’m sending it to a few friends ans additionally shaeing in delicious.
    And naturally, thanks on your sweat!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  24. Molly says:

    Thanks for sharing such a nice idea, post is good, thats why i have read it completely

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  25. Nannie says:

    The app also allows you to monitor and records your performance knowledge for your entire workout.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  26. Cityname says:

    Hi there very cool web site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful ..
    I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally?

    I’m happy to find a lot of helpful info here in the put up, we need work
    out more strategies on this regard, thank you for sharing.
    . . . . .

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  27. This info is worth everyone’s attention. How can I find out more?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0