Maggie Gallagher’s anti-gay marriage argument is an example of pure conservative thinking.
Romney polls the winner in any head-to-head matchup within the GOP candidiate pool.
If one has views that one will not change even in the face of the best case scenario for new data against those views, then one cannot claim to be an analyst.
Yes, the US Constitution has been the most successful such document in human history. That does not mean it is a good template for other countries.
Newt may challenge the winner-take-all allocation of delegates.
Matthew Dowd asks: What happens in an election when two candidates who are each unelectable run against each other in the fall?
We, as a country, need to remember that do not hold levers that allow us to move events this way or that
Newt constantly lays claim to the title “historian” and asserts it as evidence of his insights and as a qualification for office. As such, the quality of the claim matters.
If you are going to talk about the unemployment rate, at least talk about the whole picture.
Is a vote for Gingrich (or whomever) necessarily an anti-Romney vote?