As we assess Trump’s role in all of this, it is important to think through what he did (and did not) do.
Trump’s lack of fealty to truth and reality gives supporters an out (if they choose it).
On the op/ed page of WaPo, the 10 living former U.S. secretaries of defense say things that shouldn’t have to be said.
The sitting president is asking GA officials to find votes despite the fact that the results have been confirmed thrice.
The absurd notion that the President of Senate is the arbiter and judge of the electoral vote.
A look back at the last time there was a challenge to a slate of electors.
It will be symbolic, but the symbol will be an anti-democratic one.
Trump brags about being the “most admired” and provides yet another example of poor understanding of data.
Thinking about unsupported narratives and a little bit about data usage.
First whining about losing, now whining about legislation. (And creating chaos along the way).
Granted, there are more than two. But from a political science/political history POV, these two stick out in my mind.
Wherein I detail evidence of fraud and take the Heritage Foundation’s database of fraud to task.
Although, as usual, he maintains his odious approach to it all.